<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cirque de Googles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizenmojo.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/cirque-de-googles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizenmojo.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/cirque-de-googles/</link>
	<description>hello neighbour...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 03:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivoburum</title>
		<link>http://citizenmojo.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/cirque-de-googles/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivoburum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 03:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenmojo.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to hear from you Jonathan. I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with Google regulating the themes and I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s what I said. I merely think the discussion around online safety stopped short of the mark. One reason is obvious - there were no teenagers on the panel. The other is more a feeling some participants had - more to do with time constraints (always happens) and the panelists own unwillingness to push it. But, as I mentioned, Google had the guts to tackle this issue and have begun their online safety conversation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear from you Jonathan. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with Google regulating the themes and I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s what I said. I merely think the discussion around online safety stopped short of the mark. One reason is obvious &#8211; there were no teenagers on the panel. The other is more a feeling some participants had &#8211; more to do with time constraints (always happens) and the panelists own unwillingness to push it. But, as I mentioned, Google had the guts to tackle this issue and have begun their online safety conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Nalder (@jnxyz)</title>
		<link>http://citizenmojo.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/cirque-de-googles/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Nalder (@jnxyz)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenmojo.wordpress.com/?p=499#comment-138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ivo - great to get a report right from the horses mouth - interesting also to hear your take re: Google&#039;s role in regulating the themes and discussions. Hope your&#039;s went well!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ivo &#8211; great to get a report right from the horses mouth &#8211; interesting also to hear your take re: Google&#8217;s role in regulating the themes and discussions. Hope your&#8217;s went well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
